Energy Savers
South East

Ipswich Nursery

Energy Savings
Fruit Trees
Solar Photovoltaic
Capital Cost


A family-owned South East nursery growing fruit trees has saved money and reduced energy consumption after implementing the recommendations from a recent Energy Savers Audit. The farmer adopted the auditor’s recommendations and installed a Solar PV system.

The farm consists of 1.5 ha irrigated year-round from a number of water sources, producing around 3,700 units per ha per year. Energy consumption is strongly influenced by rainfall, which has been limited on the farm for over 3 years. Most production processes are labour intensive with potting and plant movement done by hand.

The annual energy consumption for the site during the 2018-2019 period was 9,970 kWh at a cost of $2,176. The droughts from late 2017 have reduced electricity use given unused bore and dam systems but have increased water costs by $10,000 per year due to the use of town water. When the systems are operational again, energy consumption is expected to increase by 30% if supplemented by town water, otherwise, can increase more than 60% given the requirements for RO operation.

The energy consumption on the farm consists of:

  • Residential use.
  • Water Treatment: an ultra-filtration system for runoff water and reverse osmosis (RO) unit for saline bore water. The RO unit has not been used in three years, but it is expected that when is used again will increase energy costs considerably.
  • Irrigation: several pumps including transfer, dam, bore and a house pump controlled by a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) to maintain optimum efficiency and operating pressure. Dam and bore pumps have not been used in three years.
  • Other minor uses: including irrigation controls, an office, a workshop, and a dispatch shed.

A recent energy audit showed how improving the current systems can lead to energy and cost savings. The audit to install:

  • A 10kW Roof Mounted Solar PV: to offset the entire nursery energy consumption in a non-drought year, providing a zero-net electricity demand from the grid and reducing operating costs significantly.

The auditor also identified some immediate no cost or low-cost measures, as follows:

  • Replace any incandescent or fluorescent lights with a suitable LED alternative in the residential area.
  • Activate energy-saving settings in the office and other equipment or instal automated timers to turn off equipment out of hours, which can help save energy consumption by 10%.
  • Purchase energy-efficient replacements when required.

Table 1. Costs and savings from audit recommendations.

Recommendation Annual Energy Savings (kWh) Annual Costs Savings ($) Emission Savings


Capital Cost ($) Payback Period (Years)
10 kW Solar PV 14,041 3,398 11.4 14,126 3.7


The nursery has proceeded with the implementation of a Ground Mounted 13.2 kW Solar PV with a 10kW inverter including an electricity meter upgrade, with an extra capital cost of $6,600. The system has achieved savings that have been measured in a Measurement and Verification (M&V) process, as outlined in Table 2.

Table 2. Estimated and Actual energy and cost savings.

Metric Audit estimation M&V calculation Variation (%)
Energy Savings including exports (kWh) 14,041 16,432 17
Cost Savings including exports revenue ($) 3,398 1,859 -45


The greater energy savings compared to the estimated have been influenced by the larger system and a 13% increase in the average solar radiation received at this location over the re-measurement period. On the other hand, the lower 2020 feed-in tariff compared to the onsite energy offset evaluated in 2018, has considerably reduced the estimated cost savings for the implemented system.

From the solar generation, only 30% or 4,905 kWh are being used onsite valued at $1,174, and 11,416 kWh are being exported to the grid with a revenue of $685. Considering that 3,572 kWh – 42% of the total energy use onsite – are being imported from the grid at a cost of $855, there are significant potential savings from shifting consumption into the solar generation period. The total power balance of the farm, including solar exports, and the energy cost distribution, are shown in the following figures.

Energy ES163

Cost ES163

The next step for the farm is to adjust energy usage to offset as much energy consumption as possible from the grid, which would lead to higher cost savings. If the farm were to shift 3,572kWh of energy consumption per year to coincide with solar generation times, they would save an extra $170 per year.

From the implementation of recommendations in the audit, the farm has reduced energy consumption by 194%, thus becoming a net exporter of power. Costs have been reduced by 92%, including feed-in revenue, with Carbon emission savings of 13.3 t/CO2-e per year.

Table 3. Pre and post implementation energy consumption, cost and energy productivity improvements.

Metric Pre-implementation (2020) Post-implementation Reduction (%)
Energy Consumption (kWh) 8,477 -7,955 194
Cost ($) 2,029 170 92
Energy Productivity (kWh/ha) 5,651 -5,303 194


An energy audit is a good investment 

An energy audit is a great first step in moving a business towards a more efficient future by reducing energy use, costs and carbon emissions onsite.  

An energy auditor will review your past energy bills, your equipment and the way your business operates. They’ll show you where you’re using excess energy and explain what you can do about it. Find out about what’s involved in an energy audit HERE. 

See our range of agricultural energy efficiency case studies HERE and Subscribe to our bi-monthly energy e-news HERE  

If you have any energy efficiency related questions for the team get in touch at energysavers@qff.org.au.  

The Energy Savers Plus Extension Program is delivered by the Queensland Farmers Federation with support and funding from the Queensland Department of Energy and Public Works.